[Citation : RLW 2008(2) RJ 952]
(Board of Revenue for Rajasthan)
Bhanwarlal Vs. Sayar Singh & Ors. (Pandey, M.)
HONBLE GIRISH K. PANDEY, MEMBER
Bhanwarlal
Versus
Sayar Singh & Ors.
Revision/TA/2005/2007, decided on 11th June, 2008
Revision allowed.
l-iz-la-] vknsk 7 fu;e 14( vknsk 8 fu;e 1-d( vknsk 13¼3½ & oknh ds izfr-ijh{k.k ds nkSjku izfroknh dks mlds }kjk isk fd;s x;s nLrkostksa ij izu iwNus dk vf/kdkj & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & fl-iz-la- ds vknsk 7 fu;e 14( vknsk 8 fu;e 1-d( vknsk 13¼3½ ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj izfr i{k dks Lo;a }kjk isk fd;s x;s nLrkostksa ds vk/kkj ij vius izfroknh ;k muds lk{khx.k ds izfr ijh{k.k ij izu iwNus dk gd gS Hkys gh nLrkost isk ugha fd;s x;s gks ;k U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ugha yh xbZ gks & vknsk vfHk[kf.Mr ,oa vikLr fd;kA ¼in la- 3 o 4½ iqujh{k.k Lohdkj dhA
.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant Shri Ajeet Lodha and the learned counsel for the non-petitioners Shri Yogendra Singh Shaklawat and perused. The impugned order of the learned trial Court dated 22.2.07. The only question involved in this revision is as to whether the defendant has a right to ash questions on the document produced by him during the cross-examination of the plaintiff on not? Under the Code of Civil Procedure the plaintiff is required to file all the documents with the presentation of the plaint. Likewise, it is also obligatory on the defendant to file all the document pertaining to his defence of the time of filing of the written statement. At any subsequent stage, the plaintiff or defendant can file the document only with the leave of the Court by taking recourse to O7 R 14 or O8 r. 1A as the case may be.
3. O7 R 14(4), O8 R 1A(4) and O 13(3) are the specific provisions touching the point in question. As per the provisions an opposite party has a right to ask questions on the basis of the document produced by himself at the cross-examination of his adversary or his witnesses though the document was not earlier produced or no leave of the Court was obtained.
4. In the light of the relevant provisions of the C.P.C. quored above, it becomes abundantly clear that the learned lower Court failed to notice the provisions and committed an error while passing the impugned.
5. Consequently, this revision petition is accepted. The order of the learned lower Court dated 22.2.07 is quashed and set-aside. The applicant is permittedto ask questions on the basis of Jamabandies from the plaintiff or his witnesses. The applicant shall be entitled to get the documents exhisited if permissible as per the provisions of admissibility of documents.
6. The copy be sent to the learned lower Court with a direction to dispose of the case of the earliest.
7. Pronounced on this 11th June, 2006 in open Court.
The file be consigned.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.