SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 772

G.S.SARRAF
Jaikam Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Dharamgopal Chaturvedi, for Petitioner;
Arun Sharma, P.P. for State;
G.S. Fauzdar, for Complainant.

Honble SARRAF, J.—This criminal misc. petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 14.3.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Deeg in sessions case No. 20/2007 whereby he has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 91 read with Sections 173, 207 Cr.P.C.

(2). A perusal of the copy of the application filed by the petitioner in the trial Court shows that the petitioner has prayed for furnishing a copy of the statement of Pooja recorded on 4.7.2006 and a copy of the affidavit of Suresh allegedly submitted before S.H.O. Deeg and it has been further prayed that statements of certain other witnesses who were examined by the Investigating Officer during the investigation be directed to be produced in the Court as the same have not been submitted with the report filed u/S.173 Cr.P.C. and copies of such statements be provided to the petitioner.

(3). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned public prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant.

(4). As regards the affidavit of Suresh allegedly submitted before S.H.O. Deeg, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press his prayer for providing a copy thereof.

(5). As regar










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top