SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 311

[Citation : RLW 2009(1) (SC) 601]
(Supreme Court)
Satbir Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (Sinha, J.)
HONBLE S.B. SINHA, J.
HONBLE DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.
Satbir Singh & Ors.
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No. 951 of 2005, decided on 25.02.2009

Headnote:Cr.P.C., 1973, Sec. 320, 321 and Penal Code, Sec. 302 — Compounding offence committed u/Sec. 302 IPC — Appellants prosecuted for committing two murders and injury one — Held — Except in some marginal cases, the Court shall not allow composition of offence — Where parties have settled their disputes the same by itself cannot be a ground to pass a judgment of acquittal. (Para 37)

       Appeal dismissed.

        na-iz-la-] 1973] /kkjk 320] 321 ,oa n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302 & Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr fd;s x;s vijk/k dk keu djuk & nks O;fä;ksa dh gR;k ,oa ,d O;fä dks {kfr igq¡pkus ds fy, vfHk;ksftr fd;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & dqN lhekUr ekeyksa esa flok; U;k;ky; vijk/k ds keu dh vuqefr ugha nsxk & tgkW i{kdkjksa us vius fooknksa dk fuiVkjk dj fy;k gks rks ;g vius vki esa nks"keqfä dk fu.kZ; ikfjr djus dk vk/kkj ugha gks ldrkA ¼in la- 37½

       vihy [kkfjt dhA


       .

Honble SINHA, J.— Appellants are before us questioning the correctness of a judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4th April, 2005 affirming a judgment and order dated 23rd December, 1997 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut convicting the appellants herein under Sections 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 148 and 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, rigorous imprisonment for two years and rigorous imprisonment for three months respectively. The sentences were, however, directed to run concurrently.

2. Appellants, the deceased and the prosecution witnesses are agnates being descendants of one Badan Singh.

3. The genealogical chart of the family is as under :-

Badan Singh



Ratiram Kallu



Khajan Lalsingh Mulchand Shadi Ramasrey



Hemraj Atarsingh



Sachida-nand Jagban-dhan (decd.) Arun

(R-5) Anirudh

(R-6)



Dhumsingh

(now dead) Kaleyram Mittan (injured)

(PW5 now dead)


Virender Pal



Abhimanu Satyapal Jasvir Suresh-

chand

(Compl-ainant) Janmejai



Randhir

(Decd.) Sukhbir Raghunath



Nem Singh Sat-kumar




Dallu Neki Baljit Hukma Laxman Tilakram

(A-1, now dead)



Vedu Harvir Jagmeg Dansahai (A-6) Dalbir

(A-5)


Satbir

(A-4) Vakil

(A-2) Lekhpal

(A-3) Brahmpal Rajpal

4. Enmity between the two parties was a long standing one. It started with murder of one Laxman brother of Tilak Ram (A-1) and father of Dalbir (A-6) as well as Danaahai (A-5). Jagbandhan (deceased No.1), father of Arun and Anirudh alongwith 10 other persons were prosecuted therefor. Jagbandhan (deceased No.1), Dhum Singh (PW-7) and Gandhari wife of Ajab Singh (PW-6) were convicted, but others were acquitted in that case. However, the High Court on an appeal preferred by the said four persons acquitted them. Proceedings under Sections 107/117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure had also been initiated by and against both the parties.

5. The incident in question took place on 27th November, 1997 at about 11.00 a.m. According to the first information report which was lodged by Suresh Chandra (PW-1), at about 10.00 a.m. he alongwith his cousin Jagbandhan (deceased No.1) and brother-in-law Ajab Singh were working in their fields. Tilak Ram, Satbir, Vakil and Lekhpal were also plough-ing their field. At that time, they started cutting soil from the ridge of their field to which Jag-bandhan objected. To this the accused persons started abusing him. Randhir (deceased No.2) intervened. Tilak Ram (A-1) and his three sons Satbir (A-4); Valil (A-2) and Lekhpal (A-3) left the field extending threats. They returned with Dalbir (A-5) ; Dansahai (A-6) and Harvir (A- 7).

6. Accused Tilak Ram, Dalbir and Harvir were armed with ballam ; Vakil and Lekhpal were armed with Balkari and Satbir and Dansahai were armed with Bhala. Deceased No.1 Jagnandhan was smoking a ‘Hukka’ at that time. He was assaulted by the accused persons in presence of Suresh Chandra (PW-1), Mithan (PW-5) and Ajab Singh (PW-6). PW-5, Mithan is also an injured eye witness.

7. Ajab Singh (PW-6), Sachitanand and Janmajay, upon hearing the cries, ran towards the scene of occurrence. Accsued Satbir, Vakil and Lekhpal chased them. They fled and took shelter in the field of Bakhty. Mithan (PW-5), who was working in his field was also attracted by the noise. They intercepted him. Satbir assaulted him with Bhala. Meanwhile Tilak Ram reached there and asked the accused persons to leave him and proceed to the village to do away with Randhir. Accused persons therafter went towards the Village. Randhir was sitting on his cot in his ‘gher’. His wife Kishan Devi (PW-4) was cleaning the buffalo. On seeing the accused, Randhir (deceased No.2) tried to run away to save his life but was chased, surrounded and assaulted by the accused persons. He died on the spot. Upon being informed by Mithan (PW-5) that accused had gone towards the village to do away with Randh



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top