Honble SHARMA, J.—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Prahlad, complainant, against the order dated Sept. 15, 2004 of Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2 Sikar in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2004 whereby trial Court rejected the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for taking cognizance against Pannalal @ Panna Ram, Kajodi and Santosh.

(2). Brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that on the basis of the written report dated March 10, 2004 of the petitioner FIR No. 27 of 2004 was registered with Police Station Losal for commission of offences publishable under Section 498 A, 304 B IPC and Section 4 of the Dowery Prohibition Act against accused persons Panna Ram, wife of Panna Ram, Raju @ Raj Kumar and daughter of Panna Ram. It was alleged in the FIR that the accused named in the FIR have harassed and thereby caused dowery death of bride Sunita. After registering aforesaid report, the police started investigation into the matter and statements of witnesses were record. Mrig FIR No. 1/2004 registered under Section 174 Cr.P.C. with Police Station Losal and its material was also included in the case of crime FIR No. 27 of 2004. After investigation the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document