SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 229

A.M.KAPADIA, SANGEET LODHA
Commissioner (The), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Hem Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.D. Purohit, Sr. Advocate assisted by Pappu Sharma, for Petitioners

Hon ble LODHA, J.—This writ petition is directed against an order dated 26.9.08 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur (in short "the tribunal" hereinafter) in contempt Petition No. 17/08, whereby contempt proceedings have been initiated against the contemnor, appellant no.1 herein for alleged disobedience of order dated 12.8.2000 passed by the learned tribunal in O.A. No.72/99.

2. By the said order, the learned tribunal while giving liberty to the contemnor to comply with the orders of the tribunal within a period of two months and dispensing with his personal presence during the said period, has further ordered that if the order is not complied with within the stipulated period, the contemnor shall remain present in person and further proceedings shall be initiated against him.

3. The brief facts in nutshell are that the respondent no.1, an employee of the petitioner Kendriya Sangathan retired from the service. Prior to joining the services of the petitioner, the respondent no.1 had rendered services as teacher from 19.11.70 to 4.8.78 in the Department of Education Government of Rajasthan. However, while computing the pension and other retiral benefit














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top