Hon'ble VYAS, J.—Both the above writ petitions involve common controversy arising from identical facts and circumstances. The relief prayed for is identical. Hence, both these writ petitions are decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, however, facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3356/2007, Mohammed Haroon vs. State of Rajasthan & Another are taken into consideration.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing impugned notice Annex. 11 dated 8.2.2007 while praying that the respondents may be restrained to dispossess the petitioner from his commercial shoop situated at plot No. 7 & 8, Shabri Colony, Ayed, Udaipur.

3. The claim of the petitioner is that he is running his shop being tenant on the plot measuring 20' x 100' and the said land was taken on rent by him from Bheel Gameti Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. The said registered society was allotted total 14782 Sq. ft. area of land by the Urban Improvement Trust and, as per petitioner, at the time of taking this land on rent by the petitioner, the territorial jurisdiction of the land was vested in the Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur and the UIT executed a sale-deed in favour of