SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 12

PAWAN CHANDRA
Braj Sunder – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Narendra Gupta, Counsel, for Appellants;
Mahesh Sharma, Counsel, for Non-petitioners

Judgment

ih- pUnz- lnL;-&vihykFkhZx.k tks ewy izdj.k ds foi{khx.k gS] us ;g f}rh; vihy /kkjk 76 jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e 1956 ds rgr vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 20-9-06 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd izR;FkhZx.k us ,d izkFkZuk i= rglhynkj uSuok ds le{k fnukad 7-12-89 dks bl vk'k; dk izLrqr fd;k fd mudh nknh Lo- eq- ?khlh ckbZ csck ek/kks yky czkge.k fuoklh /kkuwxkao dk fu/ku rhu pkj ekg iwoZ gks pqdk gSA mudh nknh us mudh py o vpy lEifr dh olh;r muds uke ls dh gSA vr% eqrkfcd olh;rukek ukekUrjdj.k [kksydj rLnhd djus dh d`ik djsA olh;rukesa dh tjksDl udy Hkh izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk layXu dh gSA bl izkFkZuk i= dks ntZ dj rglhynkj uSuok us vU; okfjlku dks Hkh ryc dj vko';d tkap djus ds mijkUr nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj fnukad 11-12-2000 dks ikfjr fu.kZ; ds vuqlkj izR;FkhZx.k dh izkFkZuk esa cy ugha ekudj mls vLohdkj dj fn;k vkSj e`rd ?khlh ckbZ dh leLr py vpy lEifr dks lHkh fgrc) okfjlksa ds uke jktLo jsdkMZ esa vadu djus ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;sA

3- mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj izR;FkhZx.k us fo}ku vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds le{k izFke vihy izLrqr dh] ftl ij lquokbZ djus ds mijkUr mUgksaus vkyksP; fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq, rglhyn













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top