SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1068

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Abdul Fazal – Appellant
Versus
S. J. Marble Mines – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rajesh Joshi, for Petitioner;
J.R. Patel, for Respondent(s)

Hon'ble VYAS, J.—In this revision petition, the petitioner is challenging order dated 6.5.2009 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Parbatsar, whereby, the said Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner-defendant under Order VII Rule 11, read with Section 151, C.P.C. in Civil Original Suit No. 11/2009 pending before the Addl. District Judge, Parbatsar.

2. According to brief facts of the case, the respondent-plaintiffs preferred suit for declaration and permanent injunction, in which, the plaintiffs prayed that order dated 13.2.2009 passed by the Mining Engineer, Makrana in exercise of powers conferred under Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 may be quashed. After filing aforesaid civil suit, the respondent-plaintiffs also preferred a revision petition before the State Government viz., Deputy Secretary, Mines under Rule 47 of the Rules of 1986 against the same order. That revision petition was dismissed by the Deputy Secretary, Mines vide order dated 2.3.2009.

3. In the civil suit before the Addl. District Judge, Parbatsar, petitioner-defendant filed application under Order VII Rule 11, C.P.C. submitting that the civil suit is not maintainable on the ground th






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top