MAHESH BHAGWATI
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail petition.
4. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and carefully perused the relevant material on record, it is found that one F.I.R. No. 201/2007 was registered in Police Station Reengus against the petitioners in the offences under Sections 143, 148, 149, 452, 323 and 354 of IPC. Police granted bail to the petitioners under Section 436 of Cr.P.C. treating all the offences to be bailable. Thereafter, S.H.O., Police Station Reengus submitted an application through A.P.P. under Section 437(5) of Cr.P.C., seeking cancellation of bail as the offence under Section 452 of IPC had been added later on during investigation, which was non-bailable. The learned Judicial Magistrate,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.