N.K.JAIN, GUMAN SINGH
Abdul Mateen – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The trial Court, vide its impugned order, has convicted and sentenced the accused-appellants as under:-
Accused Under Section Imprisonment
1. Abdul Mateen 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 To undergo 5 years RI and a fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default, to further undergo 1 year's SI
4 of PDPP Act To undergo 10 years RI and a fine of Rs.20,000/-; in default, to further undergo 2 years SI
456 IPC To undergo 3 years RI and a fine of Rs.3000/-; in default, to further undergo 6 months SI
307/120-B IPC To undergo 10 years RI and a fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default, to further undergo 2 years SI
435/120-B IPC To undergo 7 years RI and a fine of Rs.7000/-; in default, to further undergo 1-1/2 years SI
118/120-B IPC To undergo 5 years RI and a fine of Rs.5000/-; in default, to further undergo 1 year's SI
9-B of the Explosives
Khudeswar Dutta vs. State of Assam ((1998) 4 SCC 492) 16
Salim Akhtar alias Mota vs. State of U.P. ((2003) 5 SCC 499) 16
Madan Mohan Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1954 SC 637) 17
Anirudhsinhji Karansinhji Jadeja & Anr. vs. State of Gujarat (AIR 1995 SC 2390) 17
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 1979 SC 677) 17
Mahmood vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1976 SC 69) 18
Manoranjan Singh vs. State of Delhi ((1998) 3 SCC 523) 26
Gurbax Singh vs. State of Haryana ((2001) 3 SCC 28 = RLW 2001(1) SC 152) 26
Rajesh Jagdamba Avasthi vs. State of Goa ((2005) 9 SCC 773 = RLW 2005(2) SC 177) 26
Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh ((2003) 10 SCC 586) 26
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.