SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1320

G.S.SARRAF, R.C.GANDHI
Anita Jain – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.P. Sharma, for Appellant;
Rajendra Kumar Jain, Present in Person

Hon'ble SARRAF, J.—This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 20.12.1999 passed by Judge, Family Court No.2, Jaipur whereby the application filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by the respondent has been allowed and the marriage solemnized between the respondent and the appellant has been dissolved by passing a decree of divorce.

2. Briefly stated the facts as narrated in the application filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Act on 1.11.1996 are that his marriage was solemnized with the appellant on 7.5.1985. Two sons were born, namely, Saptsheel and Anant on 19.11.88 and 14.11.89 respectively from the wedlock of the parties. The appellant was not happy with the marriage and from the beginning the appellant was behaving in a manner derogatory to the respondent and his family members. Inspite of the best efforts made by the respondent behaviour of the appellant did not change. The respondent complained of the behaviour of the appellant to her mother but the mother blamed the respondent and encouraged the appellant and began interfering in the affairs of the family of the respondent. The appellant made alleg










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top