SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 242

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, A.M.KAPADIA
National Insurance Co. – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Sanjeev Johari, for Appellant;
Dilip Kawadia, for Respondent(s)

Hon'ble VYAS, J.— In this special appeal filed under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, appellant National Insurance Company is challenging the judgment dated 14.05.2002 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.851/2001, whereby, the learned Single Judge allowed the appeal and set aside the finding of the learned Tribunal upon issues No.3 and 4 in the judgment and award dated 26.05.2001, and, modified the award while holding the appellant insurance company liable jointly and severally to pay the amount of compensation in terms of the insurance policy Ex.-NA/1 along with other non-claimant-respondents.

2. The main contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal exonerated the appellant insurance company from the liability of compensation while deciding issues No.3 and 4 in favour of the insurance company, in which, the learned Tribunal held that there is gross violation of the policy conditions because the owner as well as driver both, despite issuing notice by the insurance company, did not like to produce the driving licence before the Tribunal and, thus, the burden of proving any licence to be fake and/or invali






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top