D.B.BHOSALE, R.Y.GANOO
National Insurance Co. – Appellant
Versus
Dayanand Margeppa Pedde – Respondent
2. The facts, sans unnecessary details, are as follows: the claimant, who was hardly 23-24 years old at the time of accident, was a resident of Latur. He was in transport business and was also working as commission agent at Latur. He was also dealing in salt business. At the relevant time he had gone to Mumbai in connection with his business. The offending vehicle i.e truck no.MTQ 9031 (for short “the truck”) was attached to Kiran transport at Mumbai. On 18.2.1990, according to the claimant, he hired the truck for carrying paper/c
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. V. Chinnamma (2004 ACJ 1909 (SC))14
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Angoribai & Ors. (2005 ACJ 75 (M.P.))14
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krishnappa (2008 ACJ 668)14
Amrit Lal Sood vs. Kaushalya Devi Thapar (1998(3) SCC 744 = RLW 1998(2) SC 229)15
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. C. Giramma & Ors. (2007 ACJ 636 (AP)15
Chandro Devi & Ors. vs. Jit Singh & Ors. (1989 ACJ 41 (Delhi)15
Bodat and Co. vs. East India Trading Co. (AIR 1964 SC 538)29
Sushil Kumar vs. Rakesh Kumar (AIR 2004 SC 230)29
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Jugal Kishore ((1988) 1 SCC 626)36
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.