DR. HOOJA, C.—This is an appeal under Section 224 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (in short `the Act') against the impugned judgment dated 29.7.04 of Revenue Appellate Authority Sikar.

2. Briefly, stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent No. 1 plaintiff Hanuman Singh filed a suit against his father Kheta Ram (deceased) u/Sec. 88 of the Act in the Court of Assistant Collector Khetri who allowed the suit vide his judgment and decree dated 26.12.1978. Thereafter the appellants preferred an appeal after lapse of twenty year before Revenue Appellate Authority Sikar who dismissed the appeal as time barred by his impugned judgment dated 29.7.04 aggrieved against which this second appeal is filed.

3. The learned counsel for the respondents has filed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) for production of additional documents which comprise of a certified copy of the plaint of the suit filed by the appellant before Sub-Divisional Officer Khetri and a certified copy of the order dated 27.7.01 of Sub-Divisional Officer Khetri who dismissed the suit in default.

4. We have heard the learned counsels of both the parties.

5. The learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document