Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—The petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.5.2002, whereby he was dismissed from the post of Chief Inspector (Adventure Sports and Tourism), and the order dated 15.6.2007 whereby his departmental appeal against the dismissal order was rejected.

2. In a nutshell the case of the petitioner is that while the petitioner is that while the petitioner was working on the said post, on 20.10.1999 he submitted an application for leave for sixty-six days from 27.10.1999 to 31.12.1999. He had to go on leave as his wife was working as a Doctor in Trinidad in West Indies. In the said application, he had clearly mentioned his wife's address i Trinidad. Since the application was forwarded by the Manager, Transport Division, R.T.D.C., Jaipur, therefore, he was under a bona fide impression that the leave prayed by him would be granted. But instead of granting the leave, vide order dated 2.12.1999, the petitioner was placed under suspension. However, the said order was never served upon the petitioner. Upon his return from Trinidad, the petitioner tried to join back his duties. However, he was informed that he has been placed under suspension. Vide order dated 26.2.2000, he w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document