2010 Supreme(Raj) 385
[Citation : 2010(2) RLW 1532 (SC)]
(Supreme Court)
Jayabheri Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of A.P. & Ors. (Kabir, J.)
HON'BLE ALTAMAS KABIR, J.
HON'BLE CYRIAC JOSEPH, J.
Jayabheri Properties Pvt. Ltd. (M/s.) & Ors.
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Civil Appeal Nos. 52 with 74 & 215 of 2008, decided on 05.04.2010
Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Secs. 4(1) and 5-A — Acquisition of land for outer ring road project — Opposed on the pretext that it would affect large number of existing water bodies and environmentally sensitive zone — Held — Possession of land has already been taken u/S. 16 of the Act — Major portion of the project has been completed and only two ends of the work had to be brought together — When several plots of land are involved in an acquisition, the objection of several individual plot owners could not be entertained even u/S. 5 of the Act — The public interest will out-weigh the interest of the individual plot holders — Directed to take all possible steps to ensure that water bodies are not unduly affected and are preserved to the maximum extent possible. (Paras 26, 30 to 33)
Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894] /kkjk 4¼1½ vkSj 5-d & ckgjh fjax jksM+ ifj;kstukFkZ Hkwfe dh vokfIr & bl cgkus fojks/k fd;k fd blls cM+h la[;k esa fo|eku ty L=ksr ,oa i;kZoj.k ds :i esa vfr laosnu'khy {ks= izHkkfor gksxk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 16 ds rgr dCtk iwoZ esa gh fy;k tk pqdk gS &ifjkstuk dk cgqr cM+k fgLlk iw.kZ fd;k tk pqdk gS vkSj dk;Z ds nksuksa fljksa dks gh feykuk 'ks"k gS & tc vokfIr esa vusd Hkw[k.M lfEefyr gks rks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk ds rgr Hkh vusd Hkw[k.M Lokfe;ksa dh vH;kifr dks Hkh xzg.k ugha fd;k tk ldrk & lkoZtfud fgr futh Hkw[k.M /kkjdksa ds fgr ls vf/kd egRoiw.kZ gksxk & ;g lqfuf'pr djus gsrq gj lEHko dne mBkus ds funsZ'k fn;s fd tyk'k; vuko';d :i ls izHkkfor u gks vkSj ;Fkk laHko lhek rd mudk lao/kZu fd;k tkosA ¼in la[;k 26] 30 ls 33½
vihysa fuLrkfjr dhA
2. Two writ petitions being Writ Petition Nos.22809 and 22810 of 2006, were filed by the appellants herein, whereas Writ Petition No.26996 of 2006 was filed by T. Chittaiah and three others against the State of Andhra Pradesh and, in particular, against the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the ‘HUDA’). The three writ petitions relate to the challenge thrown to the acquisition of land comprised in Survey Nos.176, 189, 190, 191, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 and 202 of Narsingi Village and Survey Nos.292, 293 and 294 of Poppalguda Village of Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for the Outer Ring Road (ORR) Project for the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad.
3. The said project was for the purpose of providing an Inner and Intermediate Ring Road and an Outer Ring Road as part of the main circulation system for traffic. In 1984, HUDA undertook a detailed study for the development of the Intermediate Ring Road, but there was little or no progress in view of the growth of the city and advent of the Information Technology industry and various other educational and industrial projects. In 2001, the Government of Andhra Pradesh initiated a project known as the “ORR Project” and HUDA engaged M/s. MECON for feasibility study.
4. The report submitted by M/s. MECON contemplated the laying of a 109 km. 4-lane connectivity around the city. In July, 2004, the project was reexamined and on the recommendations made by senior officers of the Government and HUDA, the project was revised so that ORR could pass through open areas avoiding major settlements and habitations. The revised project was notified vide G.O.Ms.No.442 dated 19th October, 2004. The ORR alignment was finalised in April, 2005, providing for a 159 km. road around the twin cities and Ranga Reddy District.
5. The final alignment comprised of Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern sectors. Thereafter, notifications dated 13th April, 2005 and 21st April, 2005, were issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for acquisition of various lands in different sectors. Since the alignment of the Western Sector was through Poppalguda and other villages which comprised hillocks, tanks and lakes, representations were made for change of the said alignment which led to the inspection of the same by officers of the technical wing of the ORR Project. It was found that the alignment involving huge rock-cutting, would be highly uneconomical. The proposed Trumpet Interchange at the T-Junction point which was incorporated at Poppalguda Junction, was found to be affecting a water body and school building. Accordingly, an alternative alignment was considered by a Committee comprising senior officials of the Government and HUDA which inspected the alternative alignments and made certain observations. Among the observations which affected the parties to the present proceedings, was observation (e), which, on the basis of a quick survey, inter alia, provided as follows :
(i) The alignment should not affect any water body, as it was environmentally sensitive zone.
(ii) The alignment should involve minimal rock cutting and filling, as the terrain was uneven.
(iii) The alignment should involve minimal bends and curves keeping the design standards of the Outer Ring Road in mind.
6. On the basis of the aforesaid suggestions, the matter was assigned to NSS Associates, which submitted its report on 15th November, 2005, with the recommendation that the notified Western Alignment joining Phase I at Po