SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 301

PRAKASH TATIA
JAI CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates: ., B.L.MAHESHWARI, G.R.Punia, R.S.Choudhury, Servashri, Vijay Bishnoi,

TATIA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) IN these bunch of writ petitions, the facts of S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5901/09 will serve the purpose, as all the petitioners are seeking implementation of the order dated 18. 5. 2009 by which the permits to run the motor vehicles on the routes referred in the order have been granted. The reciprocal transport agreement has been made between the States of rajasthan and Haryana on September 12, 2008 in respect of inter-states route which includes the routes referred in the present writ petitions. Both the State have fixed the limit of 4 permits with 8 single trip from Rajasthan side and two permits with 8 single trip from Haryana side, as was the case in S. B. Civil Writ petition No. 5901/08 and this route finds place at S. No. 86 in Annexure 2 which is schedule of inter-state routes on which private operators of Rajasthan and haryana Roadways shall ply their buses. For grant of permit on these routes referred in the writ petitions, the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, bikaner issued notification dated 4. 2. 2009 inviting applications for grant of permits on the said route. The petitioners applied for the gran












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top