SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 116

MAHESH BHAGWATI
JEETA @ JITENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates: Amit Punia, ANURAG SHARMA,

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this criminal revision petition is to the order dated 18th November, 2009 rendered by Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Bharatpur, whereby the learned Special Judge determined the age of the petitioner and found him to be above the age of 18 years.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and carefully perused the relevant material on record, including the impugned order.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that the occurrence of this case took place on 22nd December, 2008 and FIR of this fact came to be lodged in the offences under Sections 224, 225, 332, 353, 307, 395, 397 of IPC with Police Station Mathura Gate, Bharatpur. The petitioner was arrested on 26th April, 2009 and after completion of investigation, a supplementary police report under Section 173 (2) of Cr. P. C. came to be filed in the court of Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Bharatpur on 7th June, 2009. The petitioner filed an application before the concerned Court with regard to determination of his age. The learned trial Court conducted an inquiry in accordance with the provisions of law and did not re









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top