VINEET KOTHARI
RAMESHWAR LAI – Appellant
Versus
RAMKUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE appeals have been filed by the plaintiff-appellants being aggrieved of the order dated 9. 7. 2009 passed by learned ADJ,sangaria rejecting the application of the plaintiff-appellants for seeking temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C. P. C. The plaintiffs claimed in the suit that the sale deeds executed by the deceased Pyare Lal on 25. 2. 2009 in favour of Ram Kumar, father of respondent No. 1 Girdwari Devi and in favour of Girdawari Devi herself were illegal and they were required to be cancelled.
( 2 ) IN the said suit for cancellation of sale deeds, the plaintiffs, who are lineal descendants of brothers of deceased Pyare Lal claimed temporary injunction by the aforesaid application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C. P. C.
( 3 ) THE learned trial court has rejected the said T. I. Application by finding that prima facie no case was made out by the plaintiffs for grant of such T. I. on the ground that the said deceased Pyare Lal had executed a registered adoption deed adopting the said Ram Kumar dated 26. 9. 2008. The learned trial court has also noticed in para 8 that from the preamble of the sale deed dated 25. 2. 2009 in question it appears prima
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.