Hon'ble TOTLA, J.-Appellant challenges his conviction for the offence of Section 392 IPC and sentence awarded to two years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1000/- vide judgment dated 2.6.1989 in Sessions Case No. 39/1986 (63/1985).

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Appellant Jetha Ram S/o Jagaji was charged for the offence Section 366 of 376 IPC (in relation to wife of PW 1 Jetha Ram S/o. Perna) and also for the offence of Section 392 IPC regarding her ornaments. One other accused Bhanwar Lal was also charged for the offence of Section 411 IPC - appellant per judgment under consideration is acquitted for other charge for the offences of Sections 366 & 376 IPC and is convicted and sentence for the offence of Sections 392 IPC.

4. Brief alleged facts as per prosecution and relevant for the offence convicted appear to be that on 25.5.84, Jetha Ram s/o Pemaji PW.1, presenting a typed report Ex.P1 at police station, describing in detail, informed that his wife Smt. Dharmi is deceitfully or forcibly taken by Jetha Ram s/o. Jagaji r/o. Palaya and on report is registered FIR No. 122/84 Ex.P.24 for the offence of Section 366 IPC- the w