SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1082

MAHESH BHAGWATI
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Sharan Gurjar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Pankaj Gupta, for Petitioner

Hon'ble BHAGWATI, J.—Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 29th August, 2011, whereby the learned District Judge, Jaipur, District Jaipur, returned the Execution Application to the petitioner-decree holder directing him to file the same before the court, which passed the decree.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the relevant material on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner canvassed that the property of the judgment-debtor was situated within the jurisdiction of District Judge, Jaipur District and the award in the instant case was passed by the Sole Arbitrator, Chennai (Tamil Nadu) on 3rd November, 2010. Learned counsel contended that it was not essential to obtain the transfer certificate from that executing court, which passed the decree in a particular suit. The Execution Application can be filed straight way in that court also, in whose jurisdiction, the property of the judgment-debtor is situated. He has placed reliance on the judgment rendered by Delhi High Court in the case of Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. (E.A. No. 105/2009 in Ex.No. 242/2008). Thus, the impugned order passed by the learned







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top