VINEET KOTHARI
Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
LRs. of Bala Ram – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, shorn of unnecessary details, are as under.
3. On 7.11.1997, the notification u/s 4 of the Act of 1894 was issued by the State Government seeking to acquire in all 7400 bighas of agricultural land of village Matasukh, Tehsil Jayal, Dist. Nagaur out of which 98 bighas and 11 biswas of land was of Khatedar Bala Ram, the respondent herein. The notify-cation u/s 6 of the Act was issued on 16.10.1998 as also the notification under Section 17(1) of the Act was issued on 16.10.1998. The said land was acquired for the appellant RSMML, a Government of Rajasthan undertaking for mining of lignite which was mineral found under the surface of said land in a survey conducted by the Central Government and the State Governme
Lal Chand vs. Union of India & Anr. (AIR 2010 SC 170) 8
Jawajee Nagnatham vs. Revenue Divisional Officer ((1994) 4 SCC 595) 8
Ashwini Kumar Dhingra vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1992 SC 974) 8
Land Acquisition Officer vs. Jasti Rohiti ((1995) 1 SCC 717) 8
Sagunthala vs. Special Tehsildar (AIR 2010 SC 984) 9
A. Natesam Pillai vs. Special Tehsildar ((2010) 9 SCC 118) 9
Trishala Jain & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Anr. ((2011) 6 SCC 47) 9
Diwan Brothers vs. Central Bank of India
Indore Development Authority vs. Tarak Singh & Ors. (AIR 1995 SC 1828) 13
Atma Singh vs. State of Haryana ((2008) 2 SCC 568) 14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.