Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—This criminal Cr. Misc. Petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 05.1.2012 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 7 Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur in case No. nill of 2011 by which the application filed by the petitioner for sending the complaint for investigation under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. to the Police Station, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur was dismissed.

2. It is an admitted fact that on 15.12.2011 the petitioner filed a complaint under section 190 Cr.P.C. for offences under sections 379, 406, 384, 467, 468, and 120 B IPC before the ACJM No.7 Jaipur Metropolitan Jaipur. The ACJM on 16.12.2011 passed the following order :

^^16-11-2012 ifjoknh e; odhy mi- ifjokn ij lquk x;kA ifjokn okLrs vkns'k fnukad 17-11-2011 dks is'k gksA**

3. On 17.12.2011 the ACJM passed the following order :

17-12-2011 ifjoknh odhy mi- ifjokn dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA ifjokn ds leLFk rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks e/;s utj j[krs gq, loZ izFke ifjoknh dks ijhf{kr fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gS vr% ifjokn okLrs c;ku ifjoknh fnukad 22-12-2012 dks is'k gksA**

4. On 4.1.2012 the complainant filed the following application :

^^ekU;oj]

fuosnu gS fd mä muokuh izdj.k okLrs ifjf{kr fd;s tkus ifjoknh fnukad 11-1-2012 dks rkjh[k is'kh esa fu;r gSA ifjoknh izkFkZuk i= fuEu vk/kkj ij is'k dj jgk gS&

¼1½ ;g fd mä ifjokn esa ifjoknh dh izkFkZuk gS fd ifjokn okLrs vuqlU/kku Fkkuk ctkt uxj t;iqj esa /kkjk 156¼3½ n-iz-la- ds rgr fHktokus dk vkns'k ikfjr djus dh gSA

¼2½ ;g fd ^vijk/k* dh iz—fr ,oa xEHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s vijk/k dks iqfyl vqula/kku gsrq vko';drk gSA

¼3½ ;g fd ifjoknh dks ifjf{kr fd;s tkus le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gS ftlls lk{; u"V gksus dh iw.kZ lEHkkouk gS vr% ifjokn vfr'kh?kz iqfyl vuqla/kku gsrq fHktok;s tkus dh vko';drk gSA

vr% izkFkZuk i= is'k dj fuosnu gs fd vijk/k dh iz—fr o xEHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s rFkk ifjoknh dk fjyhQ Dykt ns[krs gq, ifjokn iqfyl vuqla/kku gsrq fHktok;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr djsA

fnukad 4-1-2012 t;iqj ifjoknh*

5. On the application the ACJM passed the following order :

^^4-1-2012 izk- i= ij lquk x;kA i=koyh okLrs vkns'k fnukad 5-1-2012 dks is'k gksA**

6. On 5.1.2012 the ACJM passed the following order :

^^5-1-2012 izkFkhZ vf/koäk mi-A xr rkjh[k is'kh ij cgl izkFkZuk i= lquh x;hA gekjs }kjk lEcfU/kr i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ@ifjoknh dh vksj ls bl izkFkZuk i= esa ;g rF; vafdr fd;s x;s gS fd ifjokn dks /kkjk 156¼3½ lhvkjihlh ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk ctkt uxj dks vuqla/kku gsrq Hksts tkus ds vkns'k fd;s tkus dh —ik djsaA

ifjoknh dh vksj ls mä ifjokn fnukad 15-12-11 dsk U;k;ky; gktk esa is'k fd;k Fkk ftl ij fn- 17-12-11 dks vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s ftlesa ifjokn dks voyksdu djus ds i'pkr ifjokn ds rF; ,oe ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, loZ izFke ifjoknh dks ijhf{kr djuk U;k;ksfpr ekurs gq, c;ku ifjoknh gsrq j[kk x;k gSA bl izdkj ls U;k;ky; }kjk ifjokn ds lEcU/k esa ifjoknh ds c;ku ysus ds vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tk pqds gS vc U;k;ky; }kjk ml vkns'k ij iqu% fopkj djrs gq, /kkjk 156¼3½ lhvkjihlh ds vUrxZr vuqla/kku gsrq Hksts tkus ds vkns'k fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA ifjoknh ds c;ku fy;s tkus ds i'pkr~ ifjokn dks oklrs tkap@vuqla/kku lacaf/kr Fkkus dks Hkh Hkstk tk ldrk gSA vr% bl LVst ij izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gS ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA 'kkfey i=koyh jgsA**

7. The petitioner filed the petition challenging the order of the ACJM rejecting the application of the complainant on the ground that the ACJM has already passed orders for recording the statement of the complainant and without recording the statement the complaint could not be sent for investigation under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

8. Mr. Mahesh Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the complainat states that the ACJM without looking to the seriousness of the allegation and recovery involved in it and the fact that there will be every apprehension that officers of the Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh will destroy the evidence, rejected the application of the petitioner for sending

Click Here to Read the rest of this document