SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1300

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Bhagwana Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
J.S. Sodhi, for Petitioner;
Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—This criminal revision petition has been filed under section 397 Cr.P.C. read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 12.11.2010 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge Fast Track No.1 Beawar in Sessions Case No. 48 of 2008 under section 302 IPC, whereby the application of the State under section 311 Cr.P.C. was allowed at the stage and on the date of pronouncement of judgment.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 15.7.2008 Vinod Kumar lodged first information report before the SHO Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Ajmer for the offence under section 302 IPC. The accused was arrested on same day. Charge sheet was filed in the trial court and charge under section 302 IPC was framed. The prosecution witnesses PW.l to PW.14 were examined by the prosecution and further the prosecution produced documents Ex.P/l to Ex.P/42. In defence one witness DW.1 was examined on 20.6.2009 and thereafter final arguments were heard of both sides and the case was fixed for pronouncement of judgment on 7.9.2010 but due to some reasons the judgment could not be pronounced on that day and the next date for pronouncement of the judgment was fixed as 18.9.2010 and on this date the pr















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top