PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Roshan – Appellant
Versus
Narain Ram – Respondent
2. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this revision petition are that the defendant-petitioner filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC in the trial Court to set aside the ex-parte decree passed against him on 31.8.1996 in Civil Suit No. 51/91 (New 18/93). That application was dismissed by the trial Court vide order dt. 25.9.2006. Against the order dt. 25.9.2006 the petitioner filed Civil Misc. Appeal No. 10/2007 (No 6/2008) in the Court of District Judge, Jhunjhunu and the same was dismissed by the Appellate Court vide order dt. 28.2.2007. The defendant-petitioner challenged both the orders by filing present revision petition under Sec. 115 CPC.
3. In these circumstances, the non-petitioner has moved the present application on the ground that the revision petition is not maintainable under Sec. 115 CPC and the same is liable to be dismissed.
4. It was submitted by learned counsel for the non-petitioner that according to amended Sec. 115
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.