SANDEEP MEHTA
Nitesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to the instant petition are that the petitioner is facing trial in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 306 and 498-A, IPC. After framing of the charges, the prosecution initiated its evidence and the examination-in-chief of witnesses PW-1 Jagdish Chandra, PW-2 Tara Devi and PW-4 Devi Lal, who are said to be material witnesses of the prosecution, were recorded. The examination-in-chief of PW-1 Jagdish Chandra was recorded on 29.9.2008 and the examination-in-chief of witnesses PW-2 Tara Devi and PW-4 Devi Lal was recorded on 18.10.2008 and their cross-examination was kept reserved. It appears that thereafter the trial proceeded further and the statements of other witnesses continued to be recorded but some how or other, three witnesses referred above were not called back for cross-examin
Raghunandan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1974 SC 463) 8
Hanuman Ram vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (AIR 2009 SC 69 = 2008(4) RLW 3263 (SC)) 9
Rajendra Prasad vs. Narcotic Cell through its Officer-in-Charge
Shailendra Kumar vs. State of Bihar & Ors. ((2002) 1 SCC 655) 12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.