SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 723

H.C.SHARMA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Narayan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
J.P. Mathur, Govt. Advocate, for Appellant;
Satish Pareek, for Respondent

kekZ] lnL;&;g jsQjsal jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 82 ds vUrxZr U;k;ky; vfrfjDr dysDVj ¼r`rh;½ t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 16-11-2001 ¼izdj.k la[;k 123@2000½ ds }kjk jktLo e.My dks izkir gqvk gS ftlesa xzke FkkSykbZ rglhy teokjkex<+ dh vkjkth gky [kljk la[;k 458] 459] 437@1084 jdck dqy 7 ch?kk 19 fcLok dks jktLo fjdkMZ esa vizkFkhZx.k ds uke ls gVkdj ekQh eafnj Jh Bkdqjth okds xzke FkkSykbZ ds uke [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ djus dk fuosnu fd;k x;k gSA

2- geus i{kdkjku dks lqukA

3- fo}ku jktdh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd xzke FkkSykbZ ds vkjkth [kljk la[;k 1222] 1254] 1255] 1256] 1257] 1258] 1259] 1263 o 1264 fdrk 9 jdck 7&17 ch?kk [krkSuh tekcanh lEor~ 2008 ls 2027 esa ekQh eafnj Bkdqjth iqtkjh yknwjke iq= eksrhjke czkg~e.k ds uke ntZ FkhA laor~ 2053 ls 2025 dh tekcanh esa [kkrk la[;k 247 ij mDr Hkwfe jkeukjk;.k iq= dUgS;kyky] jkeLo:i iq= izHkwn;ky czkg~e.k ds uke iqtkfj;ksa }kjk gLrkUrj.k dj nh xbZA eafnj ewfrZ kkor ukckfyx gSA eafnj dh Hkwfe ij iqtkjh ;k vU; fdlh O;fDr dks [kkrsnkjh ugha nh tk ldrh] uk gh eafnj dh Hkwfe iqtkfj;ksa }kjk foØ; dh tk ldrh gSA vkjvkjMh 1984 ist 1¼1½] 1995 vkjvkjMh ist 418 ¼2½] ds n`"VkUr izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd eafnj dh Hkwfe dk gLrkUrj.k voS/k gqvk gS] vr% Hkwf









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top