SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Somoti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). This question arises in the circumstances set out below:-
It is the case of the petitioner that land in question was being cultivated by the ancestors of Achhi Lal as Gair Maurisi Tenant and Khatedari rights were acquired. The name of the petitioners father was entered as Khatedar in Svt. 2020 (Year 1963) in the land records. On December 26, 1990 certain inhabitants of the village having grudge against the petitioner made complaint to Collector Alwar that the agricultural land in question was of Maufi of Moorti Mandi Sita Ram ji under the management of Achhi Lal and it was wrongly entered in the Khatedari of Acchi Lal. The Additional Collector in the order dated July 26, 1994 after observing that the name of Achhi Lal was wrongly entered as khatedar remitted the record to the Director Land Records Revenue Board Ajmer, for making a reference to the Board of Revenue. The Director, in turn, made a reference to the Board of Revenue vide judgment dated August 8, 1997. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.