SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1066

H.C.SHARMA
Mukut Chand – Appellant
Versus
Deoki Nandan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Yagyadutt Sharma, for Petitioner;
Ashok Agrawal, for Respondents

kekZ] lnL;&izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g nks fuxjkfu;ka jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 84 ds varxZr Øek% U;k;ky; vfrfjDr laHkkxh; vk;qDr dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 18-11-1999 ,oa U;k;ky; rglhynkj ekaxjksy ds fu.kZ; fnukad 17-4-2004 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- bu nksuksa fuxjkfu;ksa esa i{kdkj ,oa fookfnr Hkwfe ,d leku gksus ds dkj.k bu fuLrkj.k bl ,d gh fu.kZ; ls fd;k tk jgk gSA fu.kZ; dh ,d ,d izfr nksuksa i=kofy;ksa ls layXu dh tkosA

fuxjkuh la[;k 11@2000%

3- bl fuxjkuh ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd xzke ekaxjksy dh fookfnr vkjkth [kljk ua- 2541 jdck 10&17 ch?kk ,oa 2542 jdck 13&06 ch?kk dqy jdck 24&03 ch?kk gky [kljk ua- 4338] 4346] 4349 e`rd vkRekjke iq= xksikynkl dh [kkrsnkjh Hkwfe FkhA fnukad 5-3-1984 dks lgk;d Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ekaxjksy us e`rd vkRekjke dk ,dek= iq= o okfjl izkFkhZ eqdqVpan dks ekurs gq, mDr vkjkft;kr dk ukekUrj.k vkRekjke ds LFkku ij eqdqVpan ds i{k esa Lohdkj dj fn;kA lgk;d Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ds mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 5-3-1984 ds fo:) bl fuxjkuh ds vizkFkhZx.k nsodhuanu oxSjk us U;k;ky; mi ftyk dyDVj ckjka esa vihy izLrqr dhA mi ftyk dyDVj ckjka us fu.kZ; fnukad 12-7-1990 ds }kjk lgk;d Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ekaxjksy dk fu.kZ; fnukad 5-3-1984 fujLr djds izdj.k rglhy













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top