SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 675

H.C.SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
J.P. Mathur, Govt. Advocate, for State;
Respondent Not present prior Information

kekZ] lnL;&;g jsQjsal jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 82 ds varxZr U;k;ky; ftyk dysDVj lokbZ ek/kksiqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 12-6-2000 }kjk jktLo e.My dks izkIr gqvk gSA

2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gSa fd xzke lsywdk Vkijk ds vkjkth [kljk ua- 542@1996 esa 999&72 oxZ xt Hkwfe dk rglhynkj lokbZ ek/kksiqj us vknsk fnukad 28-9-1996 ds }kjk jktLFkku Hkw jktLo ¼xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa d`f"k Hkwfe dk vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ laifjorZu½ fu;e 1992 ds vUrxZr :ikarj.k fd;kA mDr :ikarj.k vkns ds fo:) rglhynkj lokbZ ek/kksiqj us ftyk dysDVj lokbZ ek/kksiqj dks jsQjsal izkFkZuk i= ;g dgrs gq, izLrqr fd;k fd xzke lsywdk Vkijk uxj ikfydk lhek ls 1 fdyksehVj ds vUrxZr vkrk gS rFkk isjhQsjh xkao gSA isjhQsjh xkao esa :ikUrj.k dk vf/kdkj mi [k.M vf/kdkjh dks gSA rglhynkj dk vknsk {ks=kf/kdkj ls ckgj gS vr% :ikarj.k vknsk fujLr fd; tkosA ftyk dysDVj us izdj.k esa tkap djds fookfnr {ks= uxjikfydk dh isjhQsjh lhek esa vkus ds dkj.k rglhynkj ds fookfnr :ikarj.k vknsk dks fujLr djus gsrq ;g jsQjsal jktLo e.My dks Hkstk gSA

3- vizkFkhZ ckotwn rkehy uksfVl vuqifLFkr gS] ftlls geus jktdh; vf/koDrk dh ,d i{kh; cgl lquhA

4- fo}ku~ jktdh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fookfnr {ks= uxj ikfydk dk isjhQsjh {ks= gS ftlesa rgl






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top