SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1061

A.K.PUROHIT
M. S. KHAN – Appellant
Versus
Bacchi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Radhey Shyam Pareek, for Appellants;
Hemant Sogani, for Respondents

iqjksfgr] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksIr esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 9-4-03 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- laf{kIr esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd jsLiksMsaV /kklh iq= lksgu ,oa xaxkjke iq= ckyw }kjk ,d jktLo okn LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk ^vf/kfu;e* dh /kkjk 188 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vkesj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k ftlesa dgk x;k gS fd [kkrk uEcj 19 dh Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 69 jdck 3 ch?kk 19 fcLok] [kljk uEcj 137 jdck 4 ch?kk 17 fcLok dqy 13 ch?kk 13 fcLok Hkwfe tks xzke [khaokl rglhy teokjkex<+ esa fLFkr gS mlds oknhx.k [kkrsnkj dkrdkj gSA okni= esa dFku fd;k x;k fd oknhx.k us mDr Hkwfe /khlk iq= >waFkk ls iathd`r foØ;&i= fnukad 14-6-78 dks :i;s 20]000@& esa [kjhnh vkSj bldk ukekUrjdj.k fnukad 14-6-78 dks oknhx.k ds uke rlnhd fd;k tkdj dCtk laHkyk fn;k jktLo jsdkMZ esa os [kkrsnkj ntZ gSA bl Hkwfe dk izfroknhx.k ¼orZeku vihykUV½ dks dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gS vkSj fnukad 2-8-79 dks izfroknhx.k us oknhx.k dh Hkwfe /kkl ij eosfk;ksa dks NksM+ dj rFkk isM+ dkVus dh ps"Vk dh blfy, mUgsa LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ls ikcUn fd;k tkosA orZeku vihykUV@izfroknhx.k us okn ls bUdkj djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd fookfnr Hkwf



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top