SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 792

P.C.BALAI
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Manbhari Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Radhey Shyam Purohit, for Applicant;
Satyadev Sharma, for Non-Applicant Nos. 1 to 8

cykbZ] lnL;&;g fuxjkuh laHkkxh; vk;qDr t;iqj ds }kjk vihy la- 10@99 esa fn;s x;s fu.kZ; fnukad 22-9-2000 ds fo:) jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e 1956 dh /kkjk 84 ds rgr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd xzke c<kjuk rglhy vkesj esa fLFkr vkjkth [k-ua- 245 jdck 1 ch?kk 12 fcLok ,oa [k-ua- 253 jdck 9 fcLok dqy fdrk 2 jdck 2 ch?kk 1 fcLok izkFkhZ vkseizdkk us vizkFkhZ la- 6 X;kjlh yky ls iathd`r foØ; i= fnukad 27-4-98 dks Ø; dhA izkFkhZ ds gd esa rglhynkj vkesj us ckn tkap 27-5-98 dks ukekUrjdj.k la- 1 Lohdkj dj fn;kA mDr ukekUrjdj.k ds fo:) vizkFkhZ la- 1 yxk;r 5 us vfrfjDr dysDVj t;iqj ua- 2 ds le{k 17-4-98 dks vihy ;g dgrs gq, izLrqr dh fd vizkFkhZ la- 6 dk iq= HkS: Fkk ftldh e`R;q gks pqdh gS o vizkFkhZ la- 1 yxk;r 5 mlds okfjl gSA fookfnr Hkwfe ,oa vU; vkjkth [k-ua- 158] 159 ,oa 167@2 iSf=d Hkwfe gSA iSf=d lEifr gksus ds dkj.k vizkFkhZ la- 6 ds thou dky ls LoRo vf/kdkj gSA 1982 esa HkS: ds thou dky esa Hkwfe dk foHkktu dj fy;k x;k Fkk o foHkktu ds vuqlkj fookfnr Hkwfe HkS: e`rd dks izkIr gqbZ o 11-11-91 dks ?kks"k.kk Hkh dj pqdk FkkA X;kjlh yky us vizsy 1998 ds izFke lIrkg esa euHkjh o mlds okfjlku dks vnyk cnyh vizkFkhZ la- 7 o 8 ls djuk tkfgj fd;k o fnukad










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top