SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1655

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL, R.N.ARVIND
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kashi Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Loonkaran Pandya, for Appellant;
Dunichand, for Respondent No.2

Jheky] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ vf/kfu;e kCn ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] guqekux<+ }kjk vihy la- 475@94 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 16-11-99 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZA

2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh /keZflag iq= jkethyky us ,d jktLo okn izfroknh dkkhjke o vU; ds fo:) gd dh ?kks"k.kk ds ckcr~ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88 ds rgr izLrqr fd;k vkSj dgk fd jkethyky iq= ;ksdj.k o dkkhjke iq= jkeir dks fnukad 30-11-71 dks pd 25 ih,e dh 18 ch?kk 16 fcLok o pd 15 ih,e dh 22 ch?kk Hkwfe vkoafVr dh xbZ ftlesa jkethyky o dkkhjke dk vk/kk&vk/kk fgLlk FkkA fnukad 16-2-73 dks pd 45 ih,e dh 17 ch?kk 18 fcLok Hkwfe Hkh jkethyky dk dkkhjke dks cfgLlk cjkcj ntZ gqbZA nksuksa us mDr Hkwfe dk caVokjk dj j[kk Fkk rFkk eqrkfcd caVokjk pd 15 ih-,e- ds iRFkj ua- 223@413 fdyk ua- 6 rk 14] 17 rk 24 dqy 16 ch?kk Hkwfe jkethyky dks izkIr gqbZ rFkk ks"k Hkwfe dkkhjke dks izkIr gqbZA ijUrq dkkhjke ds fo:) vkoUVu fnukad 30-11-71 dh fkdk;r gqbZ vkSj ,lhlh] guqekux<+ us fnukad 24-1-77 dks mldk vkoUVu [kkfjt dj fn;k rFkk mldh vihy dks Hkh [kkfjt dj fn;k x;kA fu.kZ; fnukad 24-1-77 ls jkethyky dks dksbZ ljksdkj ugha FkkA D;ksafd fkdk;r d

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top