SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 960

R.N.ARVIND
Sanwar Mal – Appellant
Versus
Paramjeet Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Atma Ram Sharma, for Petitioner;
Shiv Singh Chaudhary, for Non-Petitioner No. 1;

ARVIND, MEMBER–The brief facts of this matters are as under :–

(2). This revision petition under section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 was presented before this court against an order of S.D.O.-I, Jaipur dated 21.3.2005. By that order, S.D.O. rejected an application of the petitioner to implead him as a party in a suit instituted by non-petitioners. The member of the suit is 63/04. By this revision, the petitioner requested this court that a suit for division & permanent injunction is pending in the court of S.D.O.-I, Jaipur regarding khasra No. 96 area measuring 113 bighas. The claim of the petitioner is that he purchased a piece of land on 16.3.1980 from co-tenant Munna by a registered deed (share 9/488). This land measured 2 bighas 5 biswas and possession was handed over. In view of the purchase bya registered deed, the petitioner became a share-holder in the alleged land and he is a necessary party in the suit pending with the court of S.D.O., Jaipur. This petition was heard by Honble Member Shri B.K. Meena on 01.4.2005 and this revision was ordered to be admitted for hearing and the stay order, as requested, was also granted ordering that the order of S.D.O.-I, Jaipur































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top