SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 33

PRAKASH TATIA
Pappu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Nath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Suresh Kumbhat, for Appellant;
Ms. Monika, for Respondent

Hon'ble TATIA, J.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Co. as nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents Nos.1 and 2 - driver and owner of the vehicle.

2. The baby Pooja of the age of 4 years died in the accident occurred on 6th Nov., 2005 caused by the respondent Shiv Nath while driving the tractor No.RJ22/R-4947. The father and mother of the said girl submitted that claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sojat. The tribunal awarded lump sum amount of Rs.55,000/- to the claimants, hence, this appeal has been preferred by the claimants for enhancement of the claim amount.

3. According to learned counsel for the appellant, even if the notional income is accepted as given in the schedule appended to Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the claimants could have been awarded compensation after calculating the amount by accepting the deceased income to be Rs.15,000/- per annum.

4. Since the claimants are mother and father, therefore, the total amount on the basis of the said calculation cannot be awarded, which can be awarded to the lenient decedent. However, looking to the age of the girl as well as young ag


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top