SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 44

2009(2) CCR 1002 (Raj.)
(Rajasthan High Court)
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mokai & Ors. (Tatia, J.)
HON'BLE PRAKASH TATIA, J.
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Versus
Mokai & Ors.
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.369 of 2008, decided on 12.01.2009

Advocates Appeared
S. Johari, for Appellant;
Shambhoo Singh, D.S. Udawat and Rakesh Sinha, for Respondents

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Secs. 173 & 150 — Appeal against award — Defence of insurance company that driver of vehicle had no valid driving licence — Condition of policy was breached by insured — Held — Insurer not produce any document to show that he gave any notice to driver or owner of vehicle for obtaining the driving licence of driver — Tribunal rightly held liable to insurance company to pay compensation — No error of fact or law committed by Tribunal. (Paras 5 & 6)

        eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e] 1988] /kkjk;sa 173 ,oa 150 & vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:) vihy & chek daiuh dk izfrj{kk fd okgu dk pkyd fof/kekU; pkyu vuqKfIr ugha j[krk Fkk & chfer }kjk ikWfylh dh krksZ dks Hkax fd;k x;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ;g nkkZus gsrq chekdrkZ us dksbZ nLrkost izLrqr ugha fd;k fd og okgu ds ekfyd ;k pkyd dks pkyd dh pkyu vuqKfIr izkIr djus gsrq dksbZ uksfVl fn;k & vf/kdj.k us chek daiuh dks izfrdj Hkqxrku djus gsrq lgh :i ls nk;h Bgjk;k & vf/kdj.k }kjk rF; ;k fof/k dh =qfV dkfjr ugha dh x;hA ¼in la[;k 5 ,oa 6½

       vihy [kkfjt dhA

Hon'ble TATIA, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the claim case no.220/2000, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bali, District Pali awarded total compensation of Rs.6,37,000/- to the claimants on account of loss they suffered due to death of one Ayyaswami who died in the accident on 5.10.1999. Said victim died due to the accident caused by the non-applicant no.1 by driving the motorcycle rashly and negligently.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in this case, the claimants did not produce the license of the driver of the motorcycle which National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mokai & Ors. was insured by the appellant insurance company and, therefore, inference should have been drawn by the Tribunal that the driver of the motorcycle was not holding valid driving license at the time of accident.

4. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record also.

5. It is clear that even after taking the plea and even after when the burden is put upon the appellant, the appellant did not produce any evidence that the driver of the vehicle had no valid driving license and the policy condition was breached by the insured. It is also relevant to mention that the insurer did not produce any document to show that the insurer made any effort for obtaining the driving license of the driver by giving notice to the owner or driver of the vehicle under Section 150 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

6. In view of the above reasons, if the Tribunal held the insurance company liable to pay compensation, the Tribunal has not committed any error of fact or law.

7. Consequently, this appeal, having no merits, is hereby dismissed.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top