2009(2) CCR 1002 (Raj.)
(Rajasthan High Court)
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mokai & Ors. (Tatia, J.)
HON'BLE PRAKASH TATIA, J.
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Versus
Mokai & Ors.
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.369 of 2008, decided on 12.01.2009
eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e] 1988] /kkjk;sa 173 ,oa 150 & vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:) vihy & chek daiuh dk izfrj{kk fd okgu dk pkyd fof/kekU; pkyu vuqKfIr ugha j[krk Fkk & chfer }kjk ikWfylh dh krksZ dks Hkax fd;k x;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ;g nkkZus gsrq chekdrkZ us dksbZ nLrkost izLrqr ugha fd;k fd og okgu ds ekfyd ;k pkyd dks pkyd dh pkyu vuqKfIr izkIr djus gsrq dksbZ uksfVl fn;k & vf/kdj.k us chek daiuh dks izfrdj Hkqxrku djus gsrq lgh :i ls nk;h Bgjk;k & vf/kdj.k }kjk rF; ;k fof/k dh =qfV dkfjr ugha dh x;hA ¼in la[;k 5 ,oa 6½ vihy [kkfjt dhA
2. In the claim case no.220/2000, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bali, District Pali awarded total compensation of Rs.6,37,000/- to the claimants on account of loss they suffered due to death of one Ayyaswami who died in the accident on 5.10.1999. Said victim died due to the accident caused by the non-applicant no.1 by driving the motorcycle rashly and negligently.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in this case, the claimants did not produce the license of the driver of the motorcycle which National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mokai & Ors. was insured by the appellant insurance company and, therefore, inference should have been drawn by the Tribunal that the driver of the motorcycle was not holding valid driving license at the time of accident.
4. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record also.
5. It is clear that even after taking the plea and even after when the burden is put upon the appellant, the appellant did not produce any evidence that the driver of the vehicle had no valid driving license and the policy condition was breached by the insured. It is also relevant to mention that the insurer did not produce any document to show that the insurer made any effort for obtaining the driving license of the driver by giving notice to the owner or driver of the vehicle under Section 150 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
6. In view of the above reasons, if the Tribunal held the insurance company liable to pay compensation, the Tribunal has not committed any error of fact or law.
7. Consequently, this appeal, having no merits, is hereby dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.