SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 609

K.U.CHANDIWAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Bharat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.N. Nawandar, for Appellant;
H.I. Pathan, for Respondent No.2

Hon'ble CHANDIWAL, J.—The appellant, aggrieved by the judgment and award dt.7.4.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge and Ex Officio Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded who, by common judgment, decided M.A.C.P. Nos. 385, 421, 422, 485, 486 and 549 all of 2000, awarding part compensation to the respective claimants, holding the appellant -Union of India jointly and severally liable, with the Rickshaw Driver/owner.

2. On 18.11.2008, after hearing the Counsel for the appellant, this Court directed notices before admission returnable on 16.12.2008, indicating that the appeals are likely to be disposed of at admission stage. Record and proceedings was called for. Print was dispensed with. There was interim stay to the judgment under challenge. It is in this situation, after relentless efforts, presence of respondent No.2, Sk. Elias, the owner of the vehicle was procured. As the claimants are served, respective Counsels accept that the matter is to be decided at admission stage itself. Civil Applications were made on behalf of respondent No.2, the Rickshaw owner for producing additional evidence, it was allowed. These documents are R.T.O. particulars issued on 2.7.2008 a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top