TIWARI, M.—This is a revision petition under section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 (in short `the Act') against the order dated 26.7.2000 of Assistant Collector (Headquarter) Udaipur by which an application under Order 6 Rule 18 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) was rejected.

2. The facts, in brief leading to the revision are that during pendency of a revenue suit between the rival parties before Assistant Collector (Headquarter) Udaipur, the plaintiffs-non-petitioners filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the C.P.C. for amendment of the plaint which was allowed by the trial Court by his order dated 22.5.2000. The date given for presentation of the amendment plaint and the next date fixed for hearing was 5.7.2000. On this date presiding officer was not preset and amended plaint was also not presented. Thereafter on next date of hearing 26.7.2000 the petitioners-defendants put up an application under Order 6 Rule 18 of the C.P.C. for not permitting amendment of the plaint after expiration of the prescribed period of 14 days from the date of allowing amendment. The trial Court by the impugned order dated 26.7.2000 dismissed the application under Order 6 Rule 18 of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document