2009 Supreme(Raj) 819
[Citation : RLW 2009(2) RJ 952]
(Board of Revenue for Rajasthan)
Mohan & Ors. Vs. Ramlal & Anr. (Purohit, M.)
A.K. PUROHIT, MEMBER
Mohan & Ors.
Versus
Ramlal & Anr.
Revision/TA/I.D. No. 6721/2001/Pali, decided on 17.06.2009
Advocates Appeared
Poornashanker Dashora, for Petitioners;
Ajeet Singh, for Respondents
Headnote:C.P.C., Order 23 Rule 3, Sec. 151; Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, Sec. 88, 188, 92-A — Compromise of suit — Non-petitioner filed suit for declaration and permanent injunction against defendant-petitioner — Decreed on the basis of compromise — Compromise contained a condition that whenever the defendant-petitioner sells the land of his share, the first right will be of plaintiff — Violating this condition he sold the land to someone else — Non-petitioner filed review for dismissal of decree before S.D.O. — Allowed — Held — Impugned order of S.D.O. is illegal — Non-petitioner is at liberty to challenge the decree on the ground of violation of condition of compromise in competent Court in accordance with law. (Paras 8 & 9)
fl-iz-la-] vknsk 23] fu;e 3] /kkjk 151( jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955] /kkjk 88] 188] 92-d & okn dk jkthukek & vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ-izfroknh ds fo:) ?kks"k.kkFkZ ,oa LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk gsrq okn nk;j fd;k & jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij fMØh gqvk & jkthukesa esa ;g krZ vUrfoZ"V fd izfroknh izkFkhZ tc Hkh vius fgLls dh Hkwfe dk foØ; djsxk rks igyk gd oknh dk gksxk & bl krZ dk mYya?ku djrs gq, mlus ;g Hkwfe fdlh vU; dks csph & mDr fMØh [kkfjt djus gsrq vizkFkhZ us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds le{k iqufoZyksdu nk;j dh & Lohdkj gqbZ & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dk vk{ksfir vknsk voS/k gS & vizkFkhZ jkthukesa dh krZ ds mYya?ku ds vk/kkj ij fMØh dks fof/k ds vuq:i l{ke U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nsus gsrq Lora= gSA ¼in la[;k 8 o 9½
iqujh{k.k Lohdkj dhA
iqjksfgr] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] tSrkj.k ds vkns'k fnukad 17-9-2001 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd orZeku vizkFkhZx.k us ,d okn vUrxZr /kkjk 88] 188 ,oa 92, ^^vf/kfu;e** ckcr~ ?kks"k.kk ,oa LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk izfroknh@izkFkhZ ds fo:) lgk;d dysDVj] tSrkj.k ds le{k izLrqr fd;kA
3- lgk;d dysDVj ds ;gkW jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij nkok fnukad 8-12-87 dks fMØh fd;k x;kA mlds ckn orZeku izkFkhZ us vius [kkrsnkjh dh Hkwfe fnukad 1-2-98 dks ykykjke] jruyky] iUukyky dks jftLVMZ foØ; i= }kjk cspku dj nh ftl ij vizkFkhZx.k us lgk;d dysDVj] tSrkj.k ds ;gka lh-ih-lh- ds vkns'k 23 fu;e 3 ,oa /kkjk 151 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd jkthukesa esa Li"V vafdr gS fd tc Hkh izfroknh mlds fgLls esa vkbZ Hkwfe dk cspku djsxk rks izFke gd oknhx.k dk gksxkA izLrqr izfroknh us mä 'krZ dk mYya?ku dj Hkwfe vU; dks cspku dj nh gSA blfy;s fMØh fnukad 16-9-87 fujLr dh tkosA lgk;d dysDVj] tSrkj.k us mä izkFkZuk i= ij lquokbZ dj vius fu.kZ; fnukad 13-9-91 }kjk mä izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fMØh fn- 8-12-87 dks fujLr dj nkos dks iqu% uEcj ij fy;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k ftlls vlarq"V gksdj izkFkhZ }kjk ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk rdZ gS fd jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij ikfjr fMØh ls vlarq"V gksus ij vizkFkhZ vihy izLrqr dj ldrk Fkk ;k utjlkuh izLrqr dj ldrk Fkk ysfdu lh-ih-lh- ds vkns'k 23 fu;e 3 ds rgr fMØh dks fujLr djus dk fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fof/k fo:) gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd dk'r dh Hkwfe ds ckcr~ ^gd'kQk* dk fl)kUr ykxw gh ugha gksrk gS] blfy;s Hkh ,slk ikcUnh dk dkuwuh egRo ugha gSA
5- vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koäk dk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds lh-ih-lh- ds vkWMZj 23 :y 3 ds izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj djus esa dksbZ dkuwuh xyrh ugha dh gS D;ksafd jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij ikfjr fMØh esa ;g 'krZ Fkh fd orZeku izkFkhZ ;fn Hkwfe dk cspku djsxk rks vizkFkhZx.k dks gh djsxk vkSj izkFkhZ us mä 'krZ dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA
6- geusa nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkvksa ds rdZ lqusA mu ij euu fd;k rFkk fuxjkuh/khu vkns'k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA
7- izLrqr izdj.k esa ;g rF; fookfnr ugha gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k fMØh fnukad 16-9-87 jkthukesa ds vk/kkj ij ikfjr dh xbZ gSA ;g Hkh fookfnr ugha gS fd mä jkthukesa esa Hkwfe vizkFkhZx.k dks cs[ku djus esa 'krZ Fkh ftldk mYya?ku gqvk gSA vc iz'u ;g gS fd orZeku vizkFkhZx.k dks D;k dkuwuh mipkj miyC/k Fks\ blds fy;s lh-ih-lh- ds vkWMZj 23 :y 3 ds izko/kkuksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;k] tks bl izdkj gS %&"O. 23 R. 3"
Compromise of suit — Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise [in writing and signed by the parties], or where the defendant satisfies the plaintiff in respect of the whole or any part of the subject matter of the suit, the Court shall order such agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded, and shall pass a decree in accordance therewith [so far as it relates to the parties to the suit, whether or not the subject matter of the agreement, compromise or satisfaction is the same as the subject matter of the suit];
[Provided that where it is alleged by one party and denied by the other that an adjustment or satisfaction has been arrived at the Court shall decide the questin; but no adjournment shall be granted for the purpose of deciding the question, unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks fit to grant such adjournment.]
[Explanation.—An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule.]
;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vizkFkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj djus dk ;g vk/kkj crk;k gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe dks izfroknh }kjk cspus dh lwjr esa ekfQd cktk: dher izFke vf/kdkj oknh dk gksus dh 'krZ gS rFkk Hkwfe fdlh vU; dks cspus ls mDr 'krZ dk mYya?ku gqvk gSA ysfdu D;k ,slh lwjr esa lh-ih-lh- ds vkns'k 23 :y 3 ds izko/kku ykxw gksaxs\
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
