A.K.PUROHIT, G.K.TIWARI
Hangami – Appellant
Versus
Sodara – Respondent
2. Briefly stated, the facts leading to the second appeal are that the respondent No. 1 filed a suit under Sections 88, 89 and 188 of the Act before Sub-Divisional Officer Kekri (Ajmer) for declaration of Khatedari rights in respect of the disputed land. The trial Court decreed the suit by its judgment dated 9.5.05; aggrieved against which the appellant-defendant filed first appeal under Section 223 of the Act before Revenue Appellate Authority Ajmer who by the impugned judgment dated 20.2.06 dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment and decree dated 9.5.05 of the trial Court. Hence the second appeal.
3. During pendency of this second appeal, the appellant filed two applications, one under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) for taking on record jamabandi Svt. 2060-63 and a leaf of old account book (Bahi). Another application filed by the appellant is under Order 1 Rule 10 of the C.P.C. for impleading State Bank of India Khawas as one of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.