SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 433

AJAY RASTOGI
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Anant Kasliwal, for Petitioner;
N.A. Naqvi, Addl. Advocate General

Hon'ble RASTOGI, J.—At joint request, since these petitions involve identical questions, were finally heard together and are being disposed of by this order.

2. Instant petitions have been filed by petitioners against notices issued on 29.12.1998 under Section 33 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 ("Stamp Act") and 47(a)(1)(c) of Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952 and so also judgments dt. 12.2.1999 passed by Collector (Stamps) Jaipur (II) holding that an instrument executed under an Award dt. 26.10.1991 passed under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ("L.A. Act") is chargeable to stamp duty under Act, 1899 and the petitioner-Corporations shall deposit requisite stamp duty alongwith interest @ 12% per annum, as referred to in respective judgments impugned -in pursuance whereof Sub-Registrar Sanganer (Jaipur) initiated proceedings for attachment of their movable and immovable properties.

3. Petitioners (Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.) are Government of India's undertaking duly registered under Section 617 of Indian Companies Act. The Government of Rajasthan initiated proceeding for acquisition of land under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act and after proce
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top