SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 676

[Citation : RLW 2009(2) RJ 1123 (HC)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
C.S. Shekhawat (Col.) (Retd.) Vs. State of Raj. (Chauhan, J.)
HON'BLE R.S. CHAUHAN, J.
Chandra Singh Shekhawat (Col.) (Retd.)
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9458 of 2005, decided on 06.05.2009

Advocates Appeared
Ms. Shalini Sheoran, for Petitioner;
Ankur Rastogi, Addl.G.A., for State

Headnote:Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of land for Agriculture Purpose) Rules, 1970; Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, Sec. 102 and Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land to Diary, Poultry and Piggery Farm) Rules, 1958 — Land allotted by Government on lease for purpose of establishing dairy/poultry farm — Land converted for agricultural purpose and decleared as "Sivai Chak" — Land allotted to the petitioner for agricultural purpose and entered as "Gair Khatedar" in Mutation in "Jama Bandi" — Tehsildar converted the rights of petitioner from "Gair Khatedari" to "khatedari" — Deputy Secretary directed Collector to cancel the mutation and convert the land as "Sivai Chak" and to repossess the petitioners land — Decision taken without giving an opportunity of hearing to petitioner — Held — Deputy Secretary was not justified in directing Collector to cancel khatedari rights and repossess the petitioners land. (Paras 24 to 26)

        jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo ¼d`f"k iz;kstukFkZ Hkw-vkoaVu½ fu;e] 1970( jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 /kkjk 102 ,oa jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo ¼Ms;jh] eqxhZkkyk] kqdj QkeZ gsrq Hkw-vkoaVu½ fu;e] 1958 & Ms;jh@eqxhZkkyk LFkkfir djus ds iz;kstukFkZ Hkwfe dk :ikUrj.k fd;k x;k vkSj mls flok; pd ds :i esa ?kksf"kr fd;k & izkFkhZ dks d`f"k iz;kstukFkZ Hkwfe vkoafVr dh vkSj tekcUnh esa ukekUrjdj.k esa xSj [kkrsnkj ds :i esa bUnzkt fd;k & rglhnkj us izkFkhZ ds vf/kdkjksa dks xSj [kkrsnkjh ls [kkrsnkjh esa rCnhy fd;k & mi lfpo us ukekUrjdj.k fujLr djus] Hkwfe dks flok; pd ds :i esa :ikUrfjr djus ,oa izkFkhZ dh Hkwfe dks iqu% dCts esa ysus gsrq dysDVj dks funsZk fn;s & izkFkhZ dks lquokbZ dk volj fn;s fcuk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj fujLr djus ,oa izkFkhZ dh Hkwfe dk dCtk okil ysus gsrq dysDVj dks funsZk nsus esa mi lfpo U;k;ksfpr ugha FkkA ¼in la[;k 24 ls 26½

       ;kfpdk Lohdkj dhA

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—Having been allotted a land, having invested lacs of rupees in developing the said land, having been granted the status of a “Khatedar”, and having been suddenly deprived of the said status, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.10.2005 before this Court.

2. The petitioner, an ex-soldier, had fought both in the 1962 Indo-China war, and in the 1965 Indo-Pak war. In order to resettle him, in November 1987, the Government had allotted, 9 Bigha, 5 Biswa of land, in khasra No.22/541, in Village Niwaru, Tehsil Jaipur to him. The said land was alloted on lease for a period of ten years for the purpose of establishing dairy/poultry farm and piggery farms under the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land to Dairy, Poultry and Piggery Farms) Rules, 1958 ('the Rules of 1958', for short). In order to develop his dairy, the petitioner invested lacs of rupees: in getting the land leveled, in getting a well dug up, in getting the electricity connection, in putting pipelines, in construction of sheds for fifteen cows. However, within a period of three to four years, half of the cows died. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a report to the Collector, Jaipur pointing out the fact that his cattles were dying one after the other. The Collector directed the Tehsildar to inquire into the working of the farm. The Collector also directed the District Chief Medical and Health Officer ('the CMHO' for short) to inquire into the quality of water which was available in the well. Eventually, the CMHO discovered that the water available in the well was not drinkable; it was the cause of death of the animals. Since the petitioner could not run a dairy farm due to the bad quality of the water, he requested the State Government to convert the land for agricultural purpose. The State Government wrote to the Jaipur Development Authority (“the JDA” for short) to issue a NOC for converting the land for agricultural purpose. Vide order dated 16.12.1995, the JDA issued the said NOC. After receiving the NOC from the JDA, the State Government allotted the land to the petitioner vide order dated 04.12.1999 under the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agriculture Purpose) Rules, 1970 ('the Rules of 1970', for short) read with Section 102 of the Land Revenue Act. The said order clearly stipulated that the land has been declared as “Sivai Chak” (Government land), and is being alloted to the petitioner for agricultural purpose. Vide order dated 24.05.2000, the Collector allotted the said land to the petitioner under the Rules of 1970. Consequently, the petitioner's name was entered as “Gair Khatedar”, in mutation Nos.457 & 458, in the “Jama Bandi” for the “Samvat Year” 2056 to 2059.

3. In the year 2004, the Jaipur Administration carried out a campaign called “Administration at your doors”. During this campaign, the petitioner submitted an application for converting his “Gair Khatedari” rights into “Khatedari” ones under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 14 of the Rules of 1970. Vide letter dated 25.11.2004, the Tehsildar inquired from the JDA about the utility and the acquisition of the land. Vide letter dated 14.12.2004, the JDA informed the Tehsildar that no scheme was proposed on the land and the land was not under acquisition. Thereafter, on 16.12.2004, the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Niwaru, issued a NOC regarding the land. Consequently, vide order dated 24.12.2004, the Tehsildar converted the rights of the petitioner from “Gair Khatedari” to “Khatedari”. Thereafter, a mutation was also entered in the name of the petitioner and the petitioner was shown as the “Khatedar” of the land. In fact, even a “Jamabandi” was issued to the petitioner clearly showing that vide mutation No.540, he has been entered as a “Khatedar”. Ever since 2004, the petitioner has been cultivating his crops of bajara, groundnut and wheat on the said land. In order to increase the agricultural yield of the land, the petitioner has again invested a large sum of money in




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top