SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 231

DINESH MAHESHWARI, ARUN BHANSALI
Megha Shetty – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
C.S. Kotwani, Manish Rajpurohit, for Appellant.

Hon'ble BHANSALI, J.—These intra court appeals by the respective appellants arise out of similar nature orders dated 9.10.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge and involving similar nature issues have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment.

2. For convenience sake, facts from D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 170/2013 (Smt. Megha Shetty vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) are taken into consideration.

3. The State Government issued an advertisement for filling up the posts of Teacher Gr. III through Direct Recruitment Examination, 2012, Level-II at District Level; the petition submitted her application from the subject 'English'; appeared in the examination and obtained 135.75 marks and was placed in the merit list at S.No. 184.

4. As per the advertisement, the available posts in the subject English, in so far as relevant for the present appeal, are indicated as under:-

Total General- 42

Reserved for Woman : General 13

Widow 4

Divorcee 1

OBC General 18

Reserved for Woman : General 5

Widow 2

Divorcee 0

(In the same manner, posts were provided for Special Backward Class, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes).

5. A cut off list was issued on 28.8.2012 by the r
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top