DINESH MAHESHWARI, ARUN BHANSALI
Megha Shetty – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent
2. For convenience sake, facts from D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 170/2013 (Smt. Megha Shetty vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) are taken into consideration.
3. The State Government issued an advertisement for filling up the posts of Teacher Gr. III through Direct Recruitment Examination, 2012, Level-II at District Level; the petition submitted her application from the subject 'English'; appeared in the examination and obtained 135.75 marks and was placed in the merit list at S.No. 184.
4. As per the advertisement, the available posts in the subject English, in so far as relevant for the present appeal, are indicated as under:-
Total General- 42
Reserved for Woman : General 13
Widow 4
Divorcee 1
OBC General 18
Reserved for Woman : General 5
Widow 2
Divorcee 0
(In the same manner, posts were provided for Special Backward Class, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes).
5. A cut off list was issued on 28.8.2012 by the r
R.K. Sabharwal vs. State of Punjab ((1995) 2 SCC 745) 16
Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan ((1995) 6 SCC 684) 17
Ritesh R. Sah vs. Dr. R.L. Yamul ((1996) 3 SCC 253) 17
Rajesh Kumar Daria vs. R.P.S.C. ((2007) 8 SCC 785) 17
Union of India vs. Ramesh Ram & Ors. ((2010) 7 SCC 234) 19
Bihari Lal Rada vs. Anil Jain (Tinu) ((2009) 4 SCC 1) 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.