SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 96

GOVIND MATHUR, BANWARI LAL SHARMA
Hakim Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
K.R. Bhati, for Appellants;
K.R. Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—The appellants-accused Yunus Khan and Hakim Khan, have challenged the impugned judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track No.2 Pali dated 22.06.2005 in Sessions Case No.09/2005 arising out of FIR o.181/2003, P.S. Siriyari (Pali) by which they were convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 364/34, 397/34, 302/34, 201 and 120-B IPC and sentenced them as under:   

S.
No.

Section

Sentence

Fine

In event of default in depositing fine

1

302/34 IPC

L.I.

Rs.1,000/-

1 Year's RI

2

397/34 IPC

10 years' RI

Rs.1,000/-

1 Year's RI

3

364/34 IPC

  7 years' RI

Rs.1,000/-

1 Year's RI

4

201 IPC

  5 years' RI

Rs.500/-

6 months' RI

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 25.12.2003, Nandlal PW-16, SHO, PS Siriyari received a telephonic message that at the boarder of Aangdosh, the jeep holders murdered a woman and after throwing her dead body, ran away. After recording this information in Rojnamcha as Ex.P/27, PW-16 Nandlal reached to the plac

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top