SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1043

DINESH MAHESHWARI, VINEET KOTHARI
Jawahar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT [APPROPRIATE HIGH COURT]

MATRIMONIAL APPEAL NO. ___ OF 20___

IN THE MATTER OF:

[Name of Husband],
Son of [Father's Name],
Aged about [Age] years,
Residing at [Address]
... APPELLANT

VERSUS

[Name of Wife],
Daughter of [Father's Name],
Aged about [Age] years,
Residing at [Address]
... RESPONDENT

APPELLANT'S SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES

SYNOPSIS:
The Appellant (Husband) filed a petition for dissolution of marriage before the Family Court, which was dismissed without considering the parties' long separation since 1996, their mediated settlement for permanent alimony, and the Respondent's (Wife's) voluntary confirmation of no possibility of reconciliation after 16 years apart. (!) [17200914890001][17200914890005] Payments totaling Rs. 8,70,700/- were tendered and accepted by the Respondent through counsel, with no evidence of collusion, force, fraud, or undue influence. [17200914890006][17200914890007][17200914890008] The Family Court erred in dismissing the petition despite these facts warranting dissolution on mutual consent basis. (!)

LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS:
- The parties have been living separately since 1996 with no possibility of marital revival. (!)
- The parties were referred to mediation and arrived at a settlement, whereby the Appellant agreed to pay Rs. 8,21,000/- as permanent alimony to the Respondent and their son, with mutual withdrawal of all cases. [17200914890001] (!)
- The Court ordered immediate payment, splitting Rs. 2,21,000/- to the son and Rs. 6,00,000/- to the Respondent, plus clearance of maintenance arrears. [17200914890002] (!)
- Prior to final orders, the Respondent expressed apprehensions and was granted time to reconsider. [17200914890003]
- The matter was adjourned multiple times, during which the Appellant agreed to an additional payment of about Rs. 50,000/-. [17200914890004]
- The Respondent, present with her son and counsel, confirmed no possibility of continuing the marriage after 16 years of separation and agreed to dissolution subject to alimony. [17200914890005]
- Payments totaling Rs. 8,70,700/- were prepared via three demand drafts/pay orders: Rs. 6,00,000/- to the Respondent, and Rs. 2,21,000/- plus Rs. 49,700/- to the son. [17200914890006] (!) (!) (!)
- The payments were received and accepted by the Respondent through her counsel. [17200914890007]
- There was no collusion between the parties; the separation since 1996 rendered revival impossible; the settlement was voluntary, free from force, fraud, or undue influence. [17200914890008]
- The Family Court dismissed the Appellant's petition for dissolution, ignoring the above facts and settlement. (!)

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

A. The Family Court materially erred in dismissing the petition for dissolution without appreciating the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage due to 16 years of continuous separation since 1996, with no reasonable prospect of reconciliation, thereby defeating the purpose of matrimonial relief. (!) [17200914890005][17200914890008]

B. The Family Court failed to consider the mediated settlement voluntarily arrived at by both parties, including payment of substantial permanent alimony of Rs. 8,21,000/- (subsequently enhanced to Rs. 8,70,700/-), which was duly tendered and accepted, warranting grant of divorce decree. [17200914890001] (!) [17200914890004][17200914890006][17200914890007]

C. Despite the Respondent's presence with her son and counsel, and her explicit confirmation of inability to continue the marriage after prolonged separation, the Family Court overlooked this voluntary consent and payment receipts, leading to a perverse dismissal. [17200914890005][17200914890007] (!) (!) (!)

D. The Family Court erred in not recognizing the absence of collusion, force, fraud, or undue influence in the settlement, as evidenced by the mediation process, adjournments granted for reconsideration, and actual receipt of payments by the Respondent. [17200914890003][17200914890004][17200914890008]

E. The impugned dismissal is contrary to principles of justice, equity, and substantial compliance with matrimonial settlement terms, including clearance of arrears and alimony distribution (Rs. 6,00,000/- to Respondent; Rs. 2,70,700/- to son), rendering continued marriage oppressive and unjust. [17200914890002] (!) [17200914890006][17200914890008]

F. The Family Court acted with material irregularity by not terminating related maintenance recovery proceedings upon settlement and payments, ignoring the mutual consent to withdraw all cases. [17200914890001] (!)

G. The impugned order is arbitrary, unreasonable, and liable to be set aside in the interest of justice, as it perpetuates a dead marriage despite clear evidence of voluntary settlement and irreconcilable differences. (!) [17200914890008]

H. The Appellant has been prejudiced by the dismissal, having fulfilled all settlement obligations, and prays for expeditious relief. [17200914890006][17200914890007] (!) (!) (!)

PRAYER

In the facts and circumstances stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

a) Set aside the impugned judgment/order dated ___ passed by the Family Court in Petition No. ___, dismissing the Appellant's petition for dissolution of marriage. (!)

b) Declare the marriage between the Appellant and Respondent as dissolved by a decree of divorce with effect from the date of this order, incorporating the terms of permanent alimony of Rs. 8,70,700/- (Rs. 6,00,000/- to Respondent; Rs. 2,70,700/- to son, with Rs. 6,00,000/- placed in a three-year fixed deposit in Respondent's name), already paid and accepted. [17200914890006][17200914890007][17200914890008] (!) (!) (!)

c) Terminate all maintenance recovery proceedings, with liberty to the Respondent to approach the Family Court for any arrears if unpaid. [17200914890001][17200914890010]

d) Award no costs to either party. [17200914890011]

e) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

Place: [City]
Date: [Date]

APPELLANT
Through

[Name of Counsel]
Advocate
[Enrollment No.]
[Address]
[Contact Details]

VERIFICATION

I, [Name of Husband], the above-named Appellant, do hereby verify that the contents of the accompanying Memorandum of Appeal in paras 1 to ___ are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

Verified at [City] on this ___ day of ___, 20___.

APPELLANT


JUDGMENT :

This miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23-8-2011 as passed in CO No. 56/2002 whereby the Family Court No. 1, Jodhpur dismissed the appellant-husband’s petition for dissolution of marriage.

2. In this matter relating to matrimonial dispute, after preliminary hearing on 19-7-2012, it appeared that elements of settlement were available, and, at request, the parties were referred to the Mediation Centre. The parties conferred with the help of the Mediator and arrived at a settlement as stated by the Mediator in his report to the following effect :

Parties namely Jawahar Lal and Smt. Pushpa have arrived at a compromise and Sh. Jawahar Lal has agreed to pay Rs. 8,21,000/- as a permanent alimony to Smt. Pushpa for their son and wife. Parties have also agreed that they shall withdraw their cases in the family Court at Jodhpur.

3. Then, during the course of submissions before the Court, further arrangements were considered and ordered in the following :

Looking to the congenial atmosphere in which the parties have taken steps to settle the matter and the terms of settlement have been submitted in writing and produced before us, we have suggested to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top