SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1040

R.S.CHAUHAN
Anshu Bhatnagar – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Bhatnagar – Respondent


ORDER :

The petitioner, Anshu Bhatnagar, has filed this transfer application for getting the divorce petition filed by the respondent, Rajendra Bhatnagar, pending in the Family Court, Jodhpur, transferred to the Family Court No.2, Jaipur.

2. Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has pleaded that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 2-7-2006 at Jaipur. Ever since then, the parties were residing at Jaipur and presently the petitioner is residing with her elderly parents at Jaipur. Out of the wedlock, a son was born at Jaipur who continues to reside with the petitioner at Jaipur. While the petitioner has filed a criminal case under Section 406 IPC at Jaipur, the respondent has filed a petition under Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act for divorce before the Family Court, Jodhpur. According to the learned counsel, since the petitioner has a small child, aged three and a half years old, and since the petitioner is residing with her elderly parents at Jaipur, she finds it extremely difficult to attend the proceedings at the Family Court at Jodhpur. Hence, her prayer that the divorce petition filed by the respondent before Family Court,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top