SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 305

VINEET KOTHARI
Bakhtawar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Inder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Hemant Dutt, for Petitioner;
V.K. Agarwal, for Respondents

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Dr. KOTHARI, J.—The petitioner - decree holder Bakhtawar Singh S/o Shri Ganda Singh has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order Annex.4 dtd. 6.12.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.1, Hanumangarh in execution proceedings in Civil Misc. Case No.14/2007 - Bakhtawar Singh vs. Mst. Inder Kaur, whereby the learned Executing Court of Additional District Judge No.1, Hanumangarh refused to execute the decree in favour of the petitioner for specific performance for purchase for 4 bighas of agricultural land which was decreed in favour of the petitioner - plaintiff in Suit No.113/2002 - Bakhtawar Singh vs. Mst. Inder Kaur on 16.8.2003.

2. The decree dtd. 16.8.2003, a copy of which is placed on record as Annex.1 directed the plaintiff - decree holder to deposit the balance consideration of Rs.15,000/- within two months with the Court for getting the specific performance of the Agreement in question dtd. 8.6.1989 and unless the judgment debtor - defendant obtained the say for the higher Court within a period of six months from the said decree dtd. 16.8.2003, the decree holder was entitled to get the





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top