SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 98

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Gorishankar – Appellant
Versus
Jagmohan Prasad Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Bharat Saini, for Petitioner;
Saket Pareek, for Respondent/s

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble TRIVEDI, J.—The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 26.10.2013 passed by the Additional District Judge No.5, Kota (hereinafter referred to as “the appellate court”) in the Civil Misc. Appeal No.13/2012, whereby the appellate court has allowed the appeal filed by the respondent-defendant, and reversed the order dated 23.06.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kota (South) (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”) in misc. application No.200/2012.

2. The short facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner-plaintiff has filed the suit against the respondent-defendant seeking permanent injunction for restraining the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit premises being houses No.4-A-20 and 4-A-21 originally belonging to late Dr. Jogendra Prasad Gupta, the brother of the respondent No.1-defendant. According to the petitioner-plaintiff both the houses were given to him by the said late Dr. Jogendra Prasad Gupta in the year 1991 as they had good relations with each other and since then the petitioner w























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top