SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 90

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Jitender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Viyom Networks Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Sudesh Bansal, for Petitioners;
Lokesh Atray, for Respondent

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble TRIVEDI, J.—With the contents of the learned counsels for the parties, the petition is being decided finally at the admission stage itself.

2. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioners-defendants under Section 115 of CPC challenging the order dated 08/10/2013 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court' for convenience) in civil Suit No.107/2013, whereby the Trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioners-defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC read with Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act').

3. The short facts, giving rise to the present petition, are that the respondent-plaintiff and the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 had entered into a lease and licence agreement dated 11.09.2007 for installation, modification, deinstallation and maintaining the equipment for providing telecommunication services upon the terrace/vacant space and on the ground space together with the space for laying cable trays and cables on the exterior portion of the building in the premises as described in the said




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top