MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Ambey Charan Sriwastava – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation – Respondent
Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This is plaintiff's second appeal preferred against judgment and decree dated 04.11.2004 passed by learned Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby judgment and decree dated 07.10.1998 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.5, Jaipur City, Jaipur, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction, has been affirmed.
2. Dispute pertains to a piece of land measuring 50.5' in east-west and 23.6' in north-south, (total area measuring 132.4 square yard), which the plaintiff-appellant claims to have purchased by registered sale-deed on 13.12.1989 from one Nathu Singh for consideration of Rs.75,000/-. The plaintiff-appellant claims that he was put in possession of this plot by said Nathu Singh at the time of execution of the sale-deed. At that time, defendant Municipal Corporation, without issuing any notice and providing opportunity of hearing, tried to dispossess him on 13.05.1996, and removed the tin-shed as well as stone slabs, with which the boundary was constructed. In those facts, the suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction was filed before the trial court. Both the trial court and the firs
Chief Conservator of Forests vs. Collector (AIR 2003 SC 1805) 8
Rajeevan vs. State of Kerala (AIR 2003 SC 1813) 8
Anathula Sudhakar vs. P. Buchi Reddy & Ors. ((2008) 4 SCC 594) 8
Subramanya Swamy Temple vs. V. Kanna Gounder ((2009) 3 SCC 306) 8
Rame Gowda vs. M. Varadappa Naidu (AIR 2004 SC 4609) 8
Nasib Kaur and others vs. Col. Surat Singh ((2013) 5 SCC 218) 12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.